HR Awards 2009
   HOME  |  CATEGORIES  |  SPONSORS  |  JUDGES  |  PAST WINNERS  |  GALLERY  
  JUDGING
CATEGORIES
The Mastertek Award for Employer of Choice (more than 1,000 employees)

The Frontier Software Award for Employer of Choice (fewer than 1000 employees)

The SageCo Award for Employer of Choice (public sector)

The Neller HR Champion (CEO) Award

The HR Partners Award for the Best HR Leader

The RedBalloon Award for Best HR Team

The National Careers & Employment Expo Award for the Next HR Generation

The Sage MicrOpay Award for Best Talent Management Strategy

The Full Circle Feedback Award for Best HR Strategy Plan

The Hays Award for Innovation in Recruitment and Retention

The Adcorp Award for Best Employer Branding Strategy

The Quadrant People Resources Award for Best Change Management Strategy

The Aon Consulting Award for Best Workplace Diversity Strategy

The Monash University Award for Best Learning and Development Strategy

The EmployeeConnect Award for Best Overall use of Technology

The Peak Health Management Award for Best Health and Wellbeing Strategy

There are 17 award categories in this year’s HR Leadership Awards, recognising excellence across the entire HR spectrum. The judging process for the HR Leadership Awards 2009 is broken down into two separate stages.

Submissions are assessed against a set of essential and desirable criteria. This approach allows for flexibility in recognising innovation or creativity, while specific quantitative evidence linked to business outcomes validates qualitative claims.

Nominations are first passed on to an extensive shortlisting panel, which is comprised of leading HR academics from around the country. This panel is responsible for examining each submission, and shortlisting candidates based on individual award criteria.

A final judging panel, comprised of independent industry experts and professionals, selects winners from the shortlisted finalists based on individual award criteria and in consultation with members of the shortlisting panel.

Both panels of judges will expect nominations to meet as many criteria as possible.


 

© 2010 Copyright     Home |  Contact Us |  About Us |  Help |  Privacy Policy